flower photo critique

Flower photo critique   Shubhang   thank you for your submission. I am happy to provide my feedback below using the Tudor Rating system which proves to be very efficient […]

Flower photo critique

 

Shubhang

 

thank you for your submission. I am happy to provide my feedback below using the Tudor Rating system which proves to be very efficient in reducing the amount of subjectivity in photography

SPP

Content 6 out of 10

I would classify flowers within the landscape photography genre. Everyone is photographing flower and for that I would have given you a 4 however you have proved skills in taking a simple flower, striping unnecessary detail, use a macro lens and also a bit of post production. The image has a good visual impact and I appreciate that. Also I thing the cold colours are a good choice making it different

Composition 4 out of 10

This is a good example of a confusing intent…either in the middle, wither rule of thirds, either half crop…your is neither. It would have taken a small effort to make this an 7-8. also I feel the flower is neither small or large to make a statement…you are in limbo ….in between intents….

Image quality 7 out of 10

I see skills in using a macro and a bit of post production. A good sense of blur and overall a good picture

Final TRS mark 6.3 out of 10

Overall a good image, a better than average, with a bit of impact. again, it would have been a very small effort to make it much better by shifting the flower to follw some rule, or not sure if you could actually get even closer….

 

I can see you have got skills…..can I ask what equipment did you use?

 

……………………………………………………………


…………………………………..

Tags:

About Christian Tudor

professional photographer, main editor at Academy of Photography and